House of Representatives Rejects Bill on Rotational Presidency Among Geopolitical Zones
Controversial Constitutional Amendment Proposal Fails to Gain Support
The Nigerian House of Representatives has voted against a constitutional amendment bill that sought to establish rotational presidency among the country’s six geopolitical zones. The proposed legislation, sponsored by Deputy Speaker Benjamin Okezie Kalu, aimed to institutionalize power rotation between the North Central, North East, North West, South East, South South, and South West regions.
Video credit to: Television Nigerian
Contentious Debate in the House
The bill, officially titled “A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,” was among seven constitutional amendment proposals considered during Tuesday’s plenary session. The debate revealed deep divisions among lawmakers regarding the merits of constitutionalizing power rotation.
Rep Aliyu Madaki (NNPP, Kano) led opposition to the bill, arguing that the principle of federal character already addressed regional representation concerns. “The issue of zoning presidency should remain within political parties’ discretion rather than being enshrined in the constitution,” Madaki contended.
Arguments For and Against
Supporters like Rep Ali Isah (PDP, Gombe) maintained that constitutional rotation would promote national unity. “This provision would ensure fairness and give every geopolitical zone a sense of belonging in Nigeria’s leadership,” Isah stated.
However, critics including Rep Sada Soli (APC, Katsina) warned of potential negative consequences. “This bill could undermine national unity by prioritizing regional interests over competence,” Soli argued. “It might limit presidential candidates and fuel regional rivalries.”
Deputy Speaker Kalu countered these concerns, asserting that “every zone has competent leaders capable of governing effectively.” He emphasized the bill’s goal to guarantee equitable participation in national governance.
Democratic Principles vs. Regional Representation
Opponents like Rep Shina Oyedeji framed the debate as a conflict between democratic values and regional considerations. “Democracy thrives on open competition, not zoning arrangements,” Oyedeji argued.
Rep Bello El-Rufai (APC, Kaduna) raised additional concerns about Nigeria’s ethnic diversity, suggesting the proposal might exacerbate tensions rather than resolve them.
Final Decision
Following extensive debate, Deputy Speaker Kalu called for a voice vote. The clear majority responded with “nay,” effectively rejecting the bill and maintaining the current constitutional framework regarding presidential elections.
For more details, read the original report at Daily Trust.